The Aerodrome Home Page
Aces of WWI
Aircraft of WWI
Books and Film
The Aerodrome Forum
Sign the Guestbook
Help
Links to Other Sites
Medals and Decorations
The Aerodrome News
Search The Aerodrome
Today in History
The Aerodrome Forum


Go Back   The Aerodrome Forum > WWI Aviation > Aircraft > Replica Aircraft


Replica Aircraft Topics related to the construction of WWI replica aircraft


Welcome to The Aerodrome Forum, an online community where you can discuss WWI aviation with thousands of other members from around the world. To gain full access to the Forum you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
  • Post messages and search the Forum

  • Privately communicate with other members

  • Participate in live chat sessions other members

  • View images by talented aviation artists in our Gallery

  • Buy, sell or trade items in our Classified Ads
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

View Poll Results: Finish Options for Sopwith Baby
Serial Number 8165 Sopwith Factory Built Baby 34 62.96%
Serial Number 2071 Blackburn Factory Built Baby 20 37.04%
Voters: 54. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 9 April 2008, 08:37 AM   #191 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Jeff Brooks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,794
 
I have been looking at fabricating a M.1C control horn, I figure they were originally pressed, but would beating one into shape work harden the metal enough to skip the heat treatment?
__________________
Jeff Brooks
Jeff Brooks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 April 2008, 10:24 AM   #192 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Joe Perkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Miami / Sebring, Florida
Posts: 1,280
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leatherhead View Post
Joe,

......, with the Camel, they added a thicker plate "sandwiched" between the two clam shell halves of the lever arm. Now the two tubes pass through three pieces of plate. They must have identified this area as a problem and modified the design......

Leatherhead,

I will have to look into this as I am certainly all for appropriate design improvements.

Thanks for making me aware of it!

Jeff, Have to defer to Leatherhead regarding the Bristol horn.
__________________
Joe


http://sopwith-baby.com/

M.V.R. Showed us what happens when you don't stick to your own rules.
Joe Perkel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 April 2008, 10:51 AM   #193 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Joe Perkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Miami / Sebring, Florida
Posts: 1,280
 
Rhino

Leatherhead,

I see you are online @ 1:48 my time. Now is a good time to call me regarding Rhino, I have a free hour or so here.
__________________
Joe


http://sopwith-baby.com/

M.V.R. Showed us what happens when you don't stick to your own rules.
Joe Perkel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 April 2008, 05:18 PM   #194 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Nick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 708
 
Quote:
The plans call for the lower bracket with the bolt holes to be 22 G.M.S.P, and the top streamlined lever section to be 18 G.M.S.T.

Easy enough to figure out the 22 / 18 Gage Mild Steel, but what is the significance of the P. and T?
Hi Joe,
I know you've already had this question answered but just my 2 cents worth.
It would seem that the plans were often written up differently but generally meant the same thing. It will often be quite specific and say something like 22g MS Plate or 1 1/8" x 17g MS Tube. Another drawing may just say 22 G Plate or even 22GMSP. I think it probably depended on who did the drawing.
Here's a couple of Camel drawings that show a difference





Cheers, Nick
Nick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 April 2008, 03:06 AM   #195 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Joe Perkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Miami / Sebring, Florida
Posts: 1,280
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick View Post
Hi Joe,
I know you've already had this question answered but just my 2 cents worth.
It would seem that the plans were often written up differently but generally meant the same thing. It will often be quite specific and say something like 22g MS Plate or 1 1/8" x 17g MS Tube. Another drawing may just say 22 G Plate or even 22GMSP. I think it probably depended on who did the drawing.


Cheers, Nick
Hi Nick,

Interesting to see the variations on these horns,..thank you!

Also neat to see the "Secret and Confidential" on the title block of some of these. I have several drawings like that for the early Schneider.

A reminder of what we're looking at was once very serious stuff indeed! Funny to think that posting these like we are, was likely once a death penalty offense! Watched "Eye of the Needle" with Donald Sutherland this week made me think of just that.

Thanks again Nick!
__________________
Joe


http://sopwith-baby.com/

M.V.R. Showed us what happens when you don't stick to your own rules.
Joe Perkel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 April 2008, 12:39 PM   #196 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Joe Perkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Miami / Sebring, Florida
Posts: 1,280
 
John G. (Off Topic)

John G.

My reply to your email has been returned as "Delivery Status Notification (failure)", X 2. I can cut and paste it via Aerodrome, or reply to me with a different email account.
__________________
Joe


http://sopwith-baby.com/

M.V.R. Showed us what happens when you don't stick to your own rules.
Joe Perkel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 April 2008, 10:37 AM   #197 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Joe Perkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Miami / Sebring, Florida
Posts: 1,280
 
Cabane Struts / Center Section

I have a question, perhaps someone can point me in the right direction.

Note how the cabane struts, center section, and fuselage all interact on this Hatz Classic. Note that these cabane struts are steel and the attachments to the fuselage.



I'm looking for a plans built biplane that has the following elements.

1) Steel tube fuselage / Wooden wings

2) A center section

3) Wooden Cabane Struts


Thanks!
__________________
Joe


http://sopwith-baby.com/

M.V.R. Showed us what happens when you don't stick to your own rules.
Joe Perkel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22 April 2008, 09:23 AM   #198 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Joe Perkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Miami / Sebring, Florida
Posts: 1,280
 
Finish Options Poll

Many thanks to those who have responded to the poll.

My own sentiments lie with the majority but, my wife favors the Blackburn built machine for it's interesting mix of colors. A long way to go yet, but fun to see the possibilities, a distinct technology advantage, so why not.

I have posted a mouse over image of the two on the CAD page of my website, which I think is interesting. CAD Page

It had been my intention to do this before but, I had not been in contact with the illustrator until recently.
__________________
Joe


http://sopwith-baby.com/

M.V.R. Showed us what happens when you don't stick to your own rules.
Joe Perkel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 April 2008, 03:38 AM   #199 (permalink)
Scout Pilot
 
brinesharks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 383
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Perkel View Post
I have a question, perhaps someone can point me in the right direction.

Note how the cabane struts, center section, and fuselage all interact on this Hatz Classic. Note that these cabane struts are steel and the attachments to the fuselage.



I'm looking for a plans built biplane that has the following elements.

1) Steel tube fuselage / Wooden wings

2) A center section

3) Wooden Cabane Struts


Thanks!
Although it doesn't have wooden struts, the EAA Acro Sport (II) has a similar set up. I'll email you some pics of the open structure. The cabane struts are actually bolted to the fuselage which could easily be adapted to wooden struts that have steel end fittings.

I also have an idea regarding floats - I'll include it in the email as well...I ramble a bit much for forum posts!
__________________
We have no effective screening methods to make sure pilots are sane.

— Dr. Herbert Haynes, Federal Aviation Authority.

Last edited by brinesharks; 25 April 2008 at 05:25 AM.
brinesharks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 April 2008, 05:06 AM   #200 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
womenfly2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 870
 
Thumbs up

Nice project! Great thread! Excellent web site!

FYI: I voted for the Blackburn color scheme too. More colorful.

Cheers,
WF2
womenfly2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
sopwith, seaplane, rnas, baby, sopwith baby project



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.5.1 PL1
Copyright ©1997 - 2012 The Aerodrome