The Aerodrome Home Page
Aces of WWI
Aircraft of WWI
Books and Film
The Aerodrome Forum
Sign the Guestbook
Help
Links to Other Sites
Medals and Decorations
The Aerodrome News
Search The Aerodrome
Today in History
The Aerodrome Forum


Go Back   The Aerodrome Forum > WWI Aviation > Aircraft > Replica Aircraft


Replica Aircraft Topics related to the construction of WWI replica aircraft


Welcome to The Aerodrome Forum, an online community where you can discuss WWI aviation with thousands of other members from around the world. To gain full access to the Forum you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
  • Post messages and search the Forum

  • Privately communicate with other members

  • Participate in live chat sessions other members

  • View images by talented aviation artists in our Gallery

  • Buy, sell or trade items in our Classified Ads
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

View Poll Results: Finish Options for Sopwith Baby
Serial Number 8165 Sopwith Factory Built Baby 34 62.96%
Serial Number 2071 Blackburn Factory Built Baby 20 37.04%
Voters: 54. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 17 August 2008, 08:05 PM   #381 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Joe Perkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Miami / Sebring, Florida
Posts: 1,280
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by womenfly2 View Post
Hi Joe, the cord sold today as rib lacing cord will out last you and I. I used this on my Pietenpol wing bracing cabling and it held up great. I have seen this done at ORA too.

All the ideas here are good, just pick one, I guess.

Cheers,
WF2

When I saw the junction, I remembered from A&P school that something was done here but, could not remember what. Got a little lazy and figured to post a quick question rather than dig but, I'll look into the period references a bit.

I like your method, and field experience with the Pietenpol speaks for itself.

Thanks WF2


Thanks to David also.
__________________
Joe


http://sopwith-baby.com/

M.V.R. Showed us what happens when you don't stick to your own rules.
Joe Perkel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17 August 2008, 08:08 PM   #382 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Joe Perkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Miami / Sebring, Florida
Posts: 1,280
 
Webmaster skills

I've been having a blast learning web development skills as I wait for my opportunity to start cutting wood!

Last October I tried a guest book but did something wrong and it did not work well. Hopefully, I fixed it this time if anyone would like to give it a try.

Thanks!
__________________
Joe


http://sopwith-baby.com/

M.V.R. Showed us what happens when you don't stick to your own rules.
Joe Perkel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 August 2008, 03:39 PM   #383 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Joe Perkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Miami / Sebring, Florida
Posts: 1,280
 
3d Model Libraries



The Clerget sure is pretty!

This one is not mine although I did add some textures. I purchased this from Turbosquid.com which has quite a library of models including Nick's Snipe and several other aircraft.

Still, a canned model like this is a big time saver and I recommend this site to anyone so interested. I'll use this once my own model is finally complete and would certainly purchase a 3d file of whatever radial I end up with.
__________________
Joe


http://sopwith-baby.com/

M.V.R. Showed us what happens when you don't stick to your own rules.
Joe Perkel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2008, 12:57 PM   #384 (permalink)
Scout Pilot
 
US95Damiani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 483
 
Mig Tig or Oxy Acetylene

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Perkel View Post
I'm not sure on this one yet Jan. I was trained plenty in gas back in A&P school but, I still have to evaluate the options carefully. Will look at TIG closely.

Thanks Jan!
Joe,

Mig is really only acceptable for production and automotive style welding. AC43.13-1B will go into detail.

For aviation use the choices are Tig and Oxy-Acetylene.

IMHO I prefer Gas welding. It can be more difficult but some of the advantages to it are, It is much less expensive to purchase the equipment, residual heat will normalize the weld area as you are welding. Drawbacks are the possibility of warping your structure if you don't take the necessary precautions to prevent it, and it is very hot dirty work, moreso than Tig.

Tig on the other hand is an excellent source and will provide very neat and tidy welds. BUT It is extremely localized heat. An advantage to this is it is easier to control warpage. A big drawback is, the areas that were welded need to be re-heated red hot with a torch and allowed to cool to normalize the stresses in the surrounding tubing. If this is not done the tubing could be susceptible to cracking in the vicinity of your welds.

I'm not an authority on this by any means, but I've done some airframe welding in my time.
__________________
Wingtip, Wheel and nose does NOT constitute a three point landing!

Any Landing you can walk away from is a good landing, BUT a truly Great landing, is one in which you can immediately re-use the airplane!

www.goldenageair.org
US95Damiani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 August 2008, 01:56 PM   #385 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Joe Perkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Miami / Sebring, Florida
Posts: 1,280
 
Mig Tig or Gas

Quote:
Originally Posted by US95Damiani View Post
Joe,

AC43.13-1B will go into detail.

For aviation use the choices are Tig and Oxy-Acetylene.
US95Damiani,

I love that reference, it truly is the bible isn't it!?

Your comments regarding heat zones and normalization, is why if I were going to do a steel frame I would in fact use the tried and true gas. Besides, I was trained with it in A&P school.

One advantage of a long delay from project inception to commencement, is lot's of time to think things through and plan. Since that post, I decided that the project would go nearly all original with the engine and float internals excepted.

It's a tough choice for various reasons but the deciding factor is simply an interest in seeing WWI aviation technology come to life. That along with the fact that original lends itself nicely to my fabrication, crate, then assembly plan.

Besides, there's a spirit there that can't be denied. Anyone having sailed both a production glass boat and a wooden one can attest to that, it's hard to qualify it's simply there.

That having been said, there's something to be said for Steve Culp's fire breathing dragon Pup!

Thanks for the input!
__________________
Joe


http://sopwith-baby.com/

M.V.R. Showed us what happens when you don't stick to your own rules.
Joe Perkel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 August 2008, 07:02 AM   #386 (permalink)
Scout Pilot
 
US95Damiani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 483
 
LOL Good choice...

Biblcal proportions! LOL
AC 43.13-1B is definitely that...!
I'll Say it again, Good choice Joe, you won't be sorry.

I personally like working with Gas! it is MUCH easier to control!!!! IMHO LOL

Have a great day!

__________________
Wingtip, Wheel and nose does NOT constitute a three point landing!

Any Landing you can walk away from is a good landing, BUT a truly Great landing, is one in which you can immediately re-use the airplane!

www.goldenageair.org
US95Damiani is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2008, 03:23 PM   #387 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Joe Perkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Miami / Sebring, Florida
Posts: 1,280
 
Diminishing Engine Choices

I just received a rather disconcerting email from one of the largest suppliers of overhauled radials in the U.S.,....not good news! HP range required for my project, availability, parts, reliability,... etc. Old news to many but, I'm still on a bit of a learning curve in the reality dept!

So two options as I see it,...

1) I will continue on and hope that the market responds at some future date with an appropriate round engine.

2) Hide a flat opposed (ala Major Larabee's DR.I) in the pinched cowl of the original Schneider and be done with it!

Option 2 looks about right as of today anyway. Let's see now, have to compute about a 2-3% annual cost increase to todays price of 36K to an appropriate Lycoming!
__________________
Joe


http://sopwith-baby.com/

M.V.R. Showed us what happens when you don't stick to your own rules.
Joe Perkel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2008, 06:28 PM   #388 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
womenfly2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 870
 
What about the Rotec R2800 or R3600 engine?



Cheers,
WF2
womenfly2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2008, 06:39 PM   #389 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Albatros_Ace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Manitoba,Canada
Posts: 576
 
great project
__________________
There is an art, or rather a knack to flying. The knack lies in learning how to throw yourself at the ground and miss. ~Douglas Adams
Albatros_Ace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 August 2008, 07:27 PM   #390 (permalink)
Observer
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 92
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Perkel View Post
I just received a rather disconcerting email from one of the largest suppliers of overhauled radials in the U.S.,....
Well, how about something like a Kinner?
David Paule is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
sopwith, seaplane, rnas, baby, sopwith baby project



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.5.1 PL1
Copyright ©1997 - 2012 The Aerodrome