The Aerodrome Home Page
Aces of WWI
Aircraft of WWI
Books and Film
The Aerodrome Forum
Sign the Guestbook
Help
Links to Other Sites
Medals and Decorations
The Aerodrome News
Search The Aerodrome
Today in History
The Aerodrome Forum

Go Back   The Aerodrome Forum > WWI Aviation > Aircraft > Replica Aircraft


Replica Aircraft Topics related to the construction of WWI replica aircraft



Welcome to The Aerodrome Forum, an online community where you can discuss WWI aviation with thousands of other members from around the world. To gain full access to the Forum you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
  • Post messages and search the Forum

  • Privately communicate with other members

  • Participate in live chat sessions other members

  • View images by talented aviation artists in our Gallery

  • Buy, sell or trade items in our Classified Ads
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 30 March 2008, 05:23 PM   #101 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,101
 
thank you Jan for your help , this is exact the way I did it . Rough cut 112 rpm , finish cut 140 rpm .
I had 5 original Oberursel Ur2 crankcases in my hands and did look for machining marks . I machine this one the same way the original was made , so it will look like an original . In a mill it is not possible, foto will come . And I do not like CNC made parts visible autosite . I think if a Oberursel looks CNC made , it looks like a joke .
franzkait is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2008, 05:47 PM   #102 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,101
 
between cylinders , a 1/8 cutting bit , so no way to do it in a mill .
thread cutting with modern carbide bits need high speed .
franzkait is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 March 2008, 05:48 PM   #103 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,101
 
----------------------------------

Last edited by franzkait; 10 November 2008 at 04:24 PM.
franzkait is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 March 2008, 04:01 AM   #104 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,101
 
the magic con rod system
Attached Images
File Type: jpg zzz2.jpg (47.2 KB, 94 views)
File Type: jpg zzz4.jpg (50.0 KB, 125 views)
franzkait is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 March 2008, 05:40 AM   #105 (permalink)
Two-seater Pilot
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Intracoastal Waterway, USA
Posts: 235
 
magic con-rod lower end

Does anyone know what advantage of this complicated design might have been?
Why not a hub with hinges (pins) like everyone else seemed to use. I think LeRhone developed this idea.

Last edited by j ferguson; 31 March 2008 at 10:09 AM.
j ferguson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 March 2008, 10:27 AM   #106 (permalink)
Two-seater Pilot
 
tengew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 278
 
This was German engineering at its best
The broom handle was the same way the only screw on the pistol was used to hold the wood grips on the rest was keyed and fitted into each other part
Udo the ring that the rod ends fit into is that an oiled bronze or don’t they rotate inside the shell…….. This is amazing to watch it all fit together
tengew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 March 2008, 11:28 AM   #107 (permalink)
Taz
Forum Ace
 
Taz's Avatar
Contributor
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 2,738
 
j- The LeRhône system was far superior because each connecting rod had its own bearing race rather than concentrating all the forces on the bearing for the master rod. This master rod also had to absorb all the side forces of the other connecting rods at less than optimal angles while the LeRhône system let each rod oscillate to a small degree in its own race, while not affecting other rods.

Taz
Terry Phillips
Taz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 March 2008, 11:37 AM   #108 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,101
 
---------------------------------------
Attached Images
File Type: jpg zzz5.jpg (40.2 KB, 85 views)
File Type: jpg zzz3.jpg (49.2 KB, 145 views)
franzkait is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 March 2008, 11:57 AM   #109 (permalink)
Two-seater Pilot
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Intracoastal Waterway, USA
Posts: 235
 
Thanks much, Terry. It looks like axis of connecting rod always lined up with axis of crank pin.

john

Last edited by j ferguson; 31 March 2008 at 12:17 PM.
j ferguson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 March 2008, 07:29 PM   #110 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
jumpinjan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Jan Servaites - Dayton, Ohio 45420
Posts: 1,058
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by j ferguson View Post
Thanks much, Terry. It looks like axis of connecting rod always lined up with axis of crank pin.
That's right. Using the master rod/slave rods approach, the orbits of the slave crankpins are aberrated (they are not exactly like the master crankpin orbit). The result is their TDC (w.r.t. crankshaft angle) & deck heights are different to the master rod cylinder. These differences need to be compensated, and they are. Using the slipper rods approach, I think all that adverse geometry is pretty much eliminated.
Jan
__________________
Highslide JS
jumpinjan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright ©1997 - 2008 The Aerodrome