










|
| Replica Aircraft Topics related to the construction of WWI replica aircraft |
Welcome to The Aerodrome Forum, an online community where you can discuss WWI aviation with thousands of other members from around the world. To gain full access to the Forum you must register for a free account. As a registered member you will be able to:
- Post messages and search the Forum
- Privately communicate with other members
- Participate in live chat sessions other members
- View images by talented aviation artists in our Gallery
- Buy, sell or trade items in our Classified Ads
All this and much more is available to you absolutely free when you register for an account, so sign up today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
|
30 March 2008, 05:23 PM
|
#101 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,101
|
thank you Jan for your help , this is exact the way I did it . Rough cut 112 rpm , finish cut 140 rpm .
I had 5 original Oberursel Ur2 crankcases in my hands and did look for machining marks . I machine this one the same way the original was made , so it will look like an original . In a mill it is not possible, foto will come . And I do not like CNC made parts visible autosite . I think if a Oberursel looks CNC made , it looks like a joke .
|
|
|
30 March 2008, 05:47 PM
|
#102 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,101
|
between cylinders , a 1/8 cutting bit , so no way to do it in a mill .
thread cutting with modern carbide bits need high speed .
|
|
|
30 March 2008, 05:48 PM
|
#103 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,101
|
----------------------------------
Last edited by franzkait; 10 November 2008 at 04:24 PM.
|
|
|
31 March 2008, 04:01 AM
|
#104 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,101
|
the magic con rod system
|
|
|
31 March 2008, 05:40 AM
|
#105 (permalink)
|
|
Two-seater Pilot
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Intracoastal Waterway, USA
Posts: 235
|
magic con-rod lower end
Does anyone know what advantage of this complicated design might have been?
Why not a hub with hinges (pins) like everyone else seemed to use. I think LeRhone developed this idea.
Last edited by j ferguson; 31 March 2008 at 10:09 AM.
|
|
|
31 March 2008, 10:27 AM
|
#106 (permalink)
|
|
Two-seater Pilot
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 278
|
This was German engineering at its best
The broom handle was the same way the only screw on the pistol was used to hold the wood grips on the rest was keyed and fitted into each other part
Udo the ring that the rod ends fit into is that an oiled bronze or don’t they rotate inside the shell…….. This is amazing to watch it all fit together

|
|
|
31 March 2008, 11:28 AM
|
#107 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Contributor
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 2,738
|
j- The LeRhône system was far superior because each connecting rod had its own bearing race rather than concentrating all the forces on the bearing for the master rod. This master rod also had to absorb all the side forces of the other connecting rods at less than optimal angles while the LeRhône system let each rod oscillate to a small degree in its own race, while not affecting other rods.
Taz
Terry Phillips
|
|
|
31 March 2008, 11:37 AM
|
#108 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,101
|
---------------------------------------
|
|
|
31 March 2008, 11:57 AM
|
#109 (permalink)
|
|
Two-seater Pilot
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Intracoastal Waterway, USA
Posts: 235
|
Thanks much, Terry. It looks like axis of connecting rod always lined up with axis of crank pin.
john
Last edited by j ferguson; 31 March 2008 at 12:17 PM.
|
|
|
31 March 2008, 07:29 PM
|
#110 (permalink)
|
|
Forum Ace
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Jan Servaites - Dayton, Ohio 45420
Posts: 1,058
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by j ferguson
Thanks much, Terry. It looks like axis of connecting rod always lined up with axis of crank pin.
|
That's right. Using the master rod/slave rods approach, the orbits of the slave crankpins are aberrated (they are not exactly like the master crankpin orbit). The result is their TDC (w.r.t. crankshaft angle) & deck heights are different to the master rod cylinder. These differences need to be compensated, and they are. Using the slipper rods approach, I think all that adverse geometry is pretty much eliminated.
Jan
__________________
|
|
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:02 PM.
|