The Aerodrome Home Page
Aces of WWI
Aircraft of WWI
Books and Film
The Aerodrome Forum
Sign the Guestbook
Help
Links to Other Sites
Medals and Decorations
The Aerodrome News
Search The Aerodrome
Today in History

Learn how to remove ads

The Aerodrome Forum


Go Back   The Aerodrome Forum > WWI Aviation > Aircraft > Replica Aircraft


Replica Aircraft Topics related to the construction of WWI replica aircraft

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2 February 2010, 02:21 PM   #1 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Joe Perkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Miami / Sebring, Florida
Posts: 1,308
 
Propellers and faux rotaries

I've been mulling over several nagging questions that I can't find quick answers to either in this forum or on the net, but relates to engine options. We see a number of Tri-planes with faux rotaries (fixed faux cylinders) hung under flat-opposed Lycomings.

1) Considering the RPM range of these engines it never occurred to me to determine what props are being used?

2) Considering also that epoxy coatings for metal props are common, does someone manufacture an acceptable faux wood finish option?
__________________
Joe


http://sopwith-baby.com/

M.V.R. Showed us what happens when you don't stick to your own rules.
Joe Perkel is offline  
Sponsored Links
Old 2 February 2010, 03:22 PM   #2 (permalink)
Shot Down
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 133
 
Just curious....

.... But why not a wood prop sheathed in fiberglass?
Eric Husher is offline  
Old 2 February 2010, 03:32 PM   #3 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
US95Damiani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 716
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Perkel View Post
I've been mulling over several nagging questions that I can't find quick answers to either in this forum or on the net, but relates to engine options. We see a number of Tri-planes with faux rotaries (fixed faux cylinders) hung under flat-opposed Lycomings.

1) Considering the RPM range of these engines it never occurred to me to determine what props are being used?

2) Considering also that epoxy coatings for metal props are common, does someone manufacture an acceptable faux wood finish option?
Joe,

Talk to Sensenich propellers in Florida, They built a special prop for a friend of mine that is 80" in Diameter Pitched to allow our Pup or a Thommy Morse to cruise at 97 MPH or so while letting the O-320 we're using to turn up the correct RPMs (2700 RPM at Full Throttle in level flight or 2150-2350 Static)
__________________
Wingtip, Wheel and nose does NOT constitute a three point landing!

Any Landing you can walk away from is a good landing, BUT a truly Great landing, is one in which you can immediately re-use the airplane!

www.goldenageair.org
US95Damiani is offline  
Old 3 February 2010, 01:46 AM   #4 (permalink)
Scout Pilot
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Northampton, England.
Posts: 497
 
The Triplane here has an IO 320 with a false rotary and the prop was specially made for it by Newton Propellers in the UK. Its 84" in diameter and 54" in Pitch. This gives us a good performance with a 90 mph cruise at 2300/2400.
Major Larabee is offline  
Old 3 February 2010, 04:41 AM   #5 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
US95Damiani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 716
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Major Larabee View Post
The Triplane here has an IO 320 with a false rotary and the prop was specially made for it by Newton Propellers in the UK. Its 84" in diameter and 54" in Pitch. This gives us a good performance with a 90 mph cruise at 2300/2400.
Sounds perfect,
What can the engine turn RPMwise?
__________________
Wingtip, Wheel and nose does NOT constitute a three point landing!

Any Landing you can walk away from is a good landing, BUT a truly Great landing, is one in which you can immediately re-use the airplane!

www.goldenageair.org
US95Damiani is offline  
Old 3 February 2010, 04:58 AM   #6 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Joe Perkel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Miami / Sebring, Florida
Posts: 1,308
 
Major Larabee and US95Damiani,

Thank you for the replies, question 1) is answered and making question 2) fairly moot in the process. Not being in a position to commit to a sale at this time, It didn't occur to me to simply ask the specialty prop manufacturers what is and is not possible.

This is strong evidence that a flat opposed 4cyl in the 160-180hp range the most accessible option for my application @ this time and for the foreseable future. Will proceed on this assumption for engine bay / cowl dimensions, and known weight considerations.

Thanks!
__________________
Joe


http://sopwith-baby.com/

M.V.R. Showed us what happens when you don't stick to your own rules.
Joe Perkel is offline  
Old 3 February 2010, 09:11 AM   #7 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
Dogtail2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Norfolk, England
Posts: 1,117
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Major Larabee View Post
The Triplane here has an IO 320 with a false rotary and the prop was specially made for it by Newton Propellers in the UK. Its 84" in diameter and 54" in Pitch. This gives us a good performance with a 90 mph cruise at 2300/2400.
Hi Mathew,

Are you sure about those numbers for the prop?
Newton told me a while ago that G-FOKK's was 80" X 48".

So I've gone for a 80" X 50" which ties in with the Sands drawing recommendation of:-

Max dia. 82"

Lyc 150-160hp 44" to 48" pitch
Lyc 180hp 48" to 52" pitch

Pete
Dogtail2 is offline  
Old 3 February 2010, 09:53 AM   #8 (permalink)
Forum Ace
 
snj5's Avatar
Contributor
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,990
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dogtail2 View Post
Hi Mathew,

Are you sure about those numbers for the prop?
Newton told me a while ago that G-FOKK's was 80" X 48".

So I've gone for a 80" X 50" which ties in with the Sands drawing recommendation of:-

Max dia. 82"

Lyc 150-160hp 44" to 48" pitch
Lyc 180hp 48" to 52" pitch

Pete
These are great data points. For our 150 hp Rotec (cruise 2000 - 2200 rpm, max 2400) F.1, Culver made us a 90" x 48" prop.
snj5 is online now  
Old 3 February 2010, 12:40 PM   #9 (permalink)
Scout Pilot
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Northampton, England.
Posts: 497
 
Now im not sure!!!! They were off the top of my head
I will go and check, after all i just fly the bluming thing!!!!!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 6216_1175905441666_1349005366_497005_107756_n.jpg (46.3 KB, 29 views)
File Type: jpg Marshalls4.jpg (48.4 KB, 26 views)
Major Larabee is offline  
Old 4 February 2010, 01:05 AM   #10 (permalink)
Scout Pilot
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Northampton, England.
Posts: 497
 
Correction, it is 80" x 48". I think paul wanted a bigger dia but Newton wouldnt do it, that will teach me to spout without checking!!

I think the BE2 prop is 84" so thats where it came from!!!

Any way it works really well and looks the part to
Major Larabee is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Oberursel rotaries Bletchley Aircraft 37 29 January 2007 11:43 AM
Rotaries Spinning Jenny Aircraft 27 1 February 2004 06:09 AM
Fake Rotaries CodyPaul Replica Aircraft 5 13 November 2003 05:42 PM
Nungesser's faux pas retread People 22 18 December 2002 10:19 PM
Faux pas? Fruitbat 2001 3 2 July 2001 05:55 PM


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
SEO by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright ©1997 - 2013 The Aerodrome