The Aerodrome Home Page
Aces of WWI
Aircraft of WWI
Books and Film
The Aerodrome Forum
Help
Links to Other Sites
Medals and Decorations
Search The Aerodrome
Today in History


The Aerodrome Forum


Go Back   The Aerodrome Forum > Archives > 2001

2001 Closed threads from 2001 (read only)

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 27 October 2001, 09:52 AM   #1
jbs
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Hi there,

While reviewing some old threads I started to wonder was it better to be a new pilot in the GAF, the FAF, or the RFC/RAF?
I realise that different timeperiods/events come into to play but on a whole ie 1914-1918, what was better/safer. This is a broad question I realise but I just wanted to see what you guys thought. Pilots could be both scout, recon, bomber etc...

cheers,
jbs
 
Old 27 October 2001, 02:49 PM   #2
Testerchild
Scout Pilot
 
Testerchild's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Sussex by the Sea
Posts: 349

 
Always best to be English, Old Chap.
__________________
Testerchild

Remembering: Driver T2/10816 G Tester, born Kirkcaldy, Fifeshire: A.S.C. & Aerial Gunner 20 Squadron RFC - my maternal grandfather: Killed in aerial combat 28.09.1917: Pont du Hem Military Cemetery, France.

Able Seaman J McCullagh, born Co. Wicklow, Ireland: my Great Uncle: Killed in action, SS Mavisbrook, 17th May 1918.

Captain R A Sellwood, born London: 44th Bn C.E.F. - My paternal Grandfather - Survived

The Union Flag runs in my veins.
Testerchild is offline  
Old 27 October 2001, 08:53 PM   #3
Ginger.
Shot Down
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,427

 
Well said old bean. :
Ginger. is offline  
Old 28 October 2001, 07:54 AM   #4
Vic_Mouton
Two-seater Pilot
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Randfontein
Posts: 245

 
Ginger & Testerchild.
How can it be best to be English if you have to endure the colonials (Read Aus, SA & NZ) beating you at your own games?

VBR
Vic
__________________
Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy - Benjamin Franklin
Vic_Mouton is offline  
Old 28 October 2001, 09:05 AM   #5
Volker_Nemsch
Forum Ace of Aces
 
Volker_Nemsch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Germany
Posts: 4,160

 
Hmm ...

... in my opinion the best chances for new pilots to survive would have been on the German side (best before winter 1917).

1.)
The German airforce mainly fought over the "own" side. In the case of problems (technical problems, damages during a fight or wounds) a new pilot had the chance to land his aircraft quickly without the danger of being a POW or having to wait a long time for (medical) help. Even German artillery flyers mostly had the advantage of the south-western winds which helped them on their way back to the own side. Long range reconaissance pilots had pretty good and reliable aircraft (Rumpler series). In my mind Zeppelin crews were the only exception.

2.)
The British "agressive" strategy gave most of the young and inexperienced allied pilots not enough time to become something like a veteran (bloody April). A "defensive" strategy in this case is better for getting some experience in aerial combat.

3.)
Aircraft like the Sopwith Camel were wonderful machines in the hands of experienced pilots but they were rather tricky for new pilots. Not all pilots had the chance to sit in a S.E.5a or a Bristol "Fighter".

4.)
Until mid 1917 the Germans had the advantage of superior fighters (for example the Albatros D.III) and tactics.

5.)
The use of parachutes on the German side. Even after a lost combat a German pilot had the chance to get out of his heavily damaged or burning aircraft (without causing a crater like an allied pilot). But some German parachutes failed to open ...

Im sure that there are other opinions ...



Best regards
Volker Nemsch
__________________
Best regards from Germany
Volker Nemsch



"My words came out fine. The problem is that they were incorrectly processed by your brain."
(???)

"Much to learn, you still have."
(Yoda)

"I never said all that shit!"
(Confucius)
Volker_Nemsch is offline  
Old 28 October 2001, 09:15 AM   #6
Vigilant
Forum Ace
 
Vigilant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: Devon
Posts: 983

 
My knowledge of things German is limited but I was struck when reading Hunting with Richthofen by Bodenschatz (basically the JG1 war diary) how rarely a pilot was lost. It tended to be two or three a month. Compare that to the experience of most RFC fighter squadrons - you could get 100% replacement of the personnel within two months.

As Volker has said, that was largely due to the differing strategies used by the air services.

Vig.
__________________
Fly a microlight - http://www.bmaa.org
Vigilant is offline  
Old 28 October 2001, 04:29 PM   #7
cam
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Vig,

>you could get 100% replacement of the
>personnel within two months.

I recall for a thread a while ago working out the turnover in 4 Sqn AFC and 3 Sqn AFC. IIRC 3 sqn had a complete flying crew turnover due to losses in 48 weeks and 4 Sqn in 33 weeks, 4 being the scout squadron. Both those squadrons arrived on the Western Front in late 1917 so didnt go through any of the periods when German technology gave the Luftstrietkrafte superiority.


cam
 
Old 28 October 2001, 09:23 PM   #8
Vin
Forum Ace
 
Join Date: Sep 1998
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 1,680

 
Vic

How many mainstream sports, including their derivatives e.g. Gridiron or baseball, can you think of that did NOT originate in the British Isles ?


Vin
__________________
Honorary Consultant on Policy and Ethics
On a Holy Purpose
The absolute self-appointed authority
Too myopic to comprehend
Fools and cowards
Foolish do-gooder, you aid and abett (sic) the devil
Such a crotchety old man
Vin is offline  
Old 29 October 2001, 02:40 AM   #9
Michael Skeet
Guest
 
Posts: n/a

Quote:
How many mainstream sports, including their derivatives e.g. Gridiron or baseball, can you think of that did NOT originate in the British Isles ?
That's a trick question. You assume that sports such as football and rounders originated in the Isles. How do you know they weren't brought there from elsewhere, or at the least were inspired by ball games seen elsewhere. Ball sports undoubtedly predate civilization in the British Isles.
 
Old 29 October 2001, 12:52 PM   #10
Barrett
Forum Ace of Aces
 
Barrett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1998
Location: The American West
Posts: 5,676

 
Without addressing odds of combat survival at a given point in the war, my impression is that until the Smith-Barry system of instruction was standardized in the RFC, French and German pilot training was definitely superiot to the Brits. Of course, without comparable stats on each air arm it's nearly impossible to draw meaningful conclusions, but the "wastage" among RFC pilot trainees was appalling.
__________________
You will not rise to the occasion: You will default to your level of training.
Barrett is offline  
 

Bookmarks

Tags
life, expectancy


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Life expectancy of a pilot in the Western Front Ruy People 3 25 January 2007 05:25 PM
Pilot training and life expectancy Wolfgangmapleleaf 2001 6 29 November 2001 10:36 AM
Looking for information on WWI life J.P._Stringfellow 2001 10 23 October 2001 11:28 AM
life span leon_hale 2000 18 15 March 2000 09:05 AM
Life Expectancy Chris Spellman 1998 2 30 September 1998 05:35 PM


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1997 - 2023 The Aerodrome