The Aerodrome Home Page
Aces of WWI
Aircraft of WWI
Books and Film
The Aerodrome Forum
Help
Links to Other Sites
Medals and Decorations
Search The Aerodrome
Today in History


The Aerodrome Forum


Go Back   The Aerodrome Forum > WWI Aviation > People

People Topics related to WWI aviation personnel

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 1 January 2006, 02:55 AM   #1
Breguet
Forum Ace of Aces
 
Breguet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 4,249

 
RNAS claims vs RFC claims

Reading the thread on "accepted" scores set me to wondering....

Did the RNAS have the same system as the RFC and for that matter did the German Naval Aviation Units use the same system as their more publicised brothers in arms? And were their pilot over-claiming ratios the same as their airforce bretheren?
Breguet is offline  
Sponsored Links
Old 1 January 2006, 05:23 AM   #2
MikeW
Forum Ace
 
MikeW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,021

 
Adrian,

I think it's safe to say the RNAS used the same system as the RFC.

An RNAS claim would be vetted by the squadron CO then passed to Wing and on up to RNAS HQ. At each stage the evidence from other parties would be assessed and a judgement made.

When an RNAS squadron was attached to the RFC, as was the case with the "Detached Squadron" in 1916 (what everyone calls Naval 8 though it wasn't), Naval 3, Naval 1, Naval 6, Naval 8, Naval 10 and Naval 9 then they had to follow the RFC regime exactly - Squadron CO, RFC Wing, RFC Brigade, and finally RFC HQ.


I know many might say that I'm biased, but my gut feeling is that in most circumstances, the RNAS claims were more realistic than those submitted by the RFC. I obviously cannot prove this, and can't be bothered to try!!!
MikeW is offline  
Old 1 January 2006, 07:55 AM   #3
Graeme
Forum Ace of Aces
 
Graeme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kent, England
Posts: 5,522

 
Adrian

Mike got there first. Essentially the paperwork got passed up the respective chain of command until somebody made an assessment of a claim's validity.

Not sure that I'd agree with Mike that RNAS claiming was any more realistic than the RFC's, but then that's my prejudice

If the weather stays crummy, perhaps I'll try and work out destroyed v out of control for each service and see what that proves, if anything

Happy New Year

Graeme
Graeme is offline  
Closed Thread

Bookmarks

Tags
rnas, claims, rfc


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Max Holtzem claims. Paul Forster People 6 14 January 2007 03:49 AM
218(B) Claims Smudger People 2 10 January 2003 09:45 AM
Claims fred 2002 4 5 January 2002 12:41 PM
CLAIMS alex_revell 2000 32 27 August 2000 12:14 AM
Greek claims Keith 1999 4 21 July 1999 08:54 AM


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Feedback Buttons provided by Advanced Post Thanks / Like (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 1997 - 2023 The Aerodrome